The Government’s fiscal position remains strong. The strength in the economy in 2007 means that fiscal results for 2007–08 are expected to be somewhat better than at the time of the October 2007 Economic Statement. Over the next two years, the Government is planning on continued surpluses, despite downward revisions to private sector forecasts for economic growth.
The Government is committed to budget planning that is accountable and transparent.
Table 5.1 provides a summary of the main changes in the fiscal projections since the October 2007 Economic Statement. The underlying budgetary surplus presented in the Economic Statement was $11.6 billion for 2007–08, $4.4 billion for 2008–09 and $4.3 billion for 2009–10.
Table 5.1
Changes in the Status Quo Fiscal Outlook
Since the October 2007 Economic Statement
(billions of dollars)
Projection | |||
---|---|---|---|
2007-08 | 2008-09 | 2009-10 | |
October 2007 Economic Statement underlying surplus |
11.6 | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Impact of economic and fiscal developments | |||
Budgetary revenues | |||
Personal income tax | -1.0 | -2.5 | -2.3 |
Corporate income tax | 0.9 | -1.0 | -1.3 |
Goods and services tax | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.3 |
Other revenues | 0.3 | -0.3 | 0.2 |
Total | 0.6 | -3.7 | -3.1 |
Program expenses | |||
Major transfers to persons | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
Major transfers to other levels of government | -0.1 | -0.5 | -0.4 |
Direct program expenses | -0.2 | 1.0 | 0.3 |
Total | -0.1 | 0.8 | 0.1 |
Public debt charges | 0.8 | 2.2 | 1.7 |
Total economic and fiscal developments | 1.4 | -0.6 | -1.3 |
Revised underlying planning surplus (before Budget 2008 measures) |
12.9 | 3.8 | 3.0 |
Notes: A positive number implies an improvement in
the budgetary balance. A negative number implies a deterioration in the budgetary balance. Totals may not add due to rounding. |
The 2007–08 underlying planning surplus is expected to be $12.9 billion, somewhat stronger than was projected at the time of the October 2007 Economic Statement. The upward revision largely reflects higher-than-expected revenues and lower-than-expected public debt charges.
Consistent with the weaker private sector economic outlook, underlying surpluses of $3.8 billion and $3.0 billion are projected for 2008–09 and 2009–10 respectively. The current projections are down from those presented in the Economic Statement by $0.6 billion in 2008–09 and $1.3 billion in 2009–10. In both years, revenues are projected to be significantly weaker than at the time of the Economic Statement, reflecting private sector forecasts of slower economic growth. However, weaker revenues are projected to be partially offset by significantly lower public debt charges resulting from lower interest rates. In the short term, lower public debt charges occur largely because of lower interest payments on debt issued at shorter maturities. In recent years, the Government has taken steps to increase the variable portion of the debt in order to achieve additional debt cost savings when interest rates fall (see Annex 2).
Budgetary revenues in 2007–08 are expected to be $0.6 billion higher than at the time of the Economic Statement, largely due to stronger-than-expected corporate income tax and Goods and Services Tax (GST) collections through December 2007. In spite of the stronger starting point, revenues in 2008–09 and 2009–10 are projected to be $3.7 billion and $3.1 billion lower respectively, primarily driven by downward revisions to private sector forecasts of economic growth in 2008. When compared to the Economic Statement:
Program expenses are also projected to be lower than estimated in the Economic Statement, by $0.8 billion in 2008–09 and $0.1 billion in 2009–10. These changes take into account economic developments, the results of the Government’s strategic reviews and recent action to reduce spending on public opinion research by $10 million per year. Compared to the Economic Statement:
The measures proposed in Budget 2008 total $2.7 billion for 2007–08, $1.5 billion for 2008–09 and $1.7 billion for 2009–10. When combined with the actions taken in the Economic Statement, this brings total measures to $29.4 billion over these three years, of which $23.9 billion, or over 80 per cent, is dedicated to tax relief. The costs of these measures are reflected in the projections of revenues and expenses presented in the following pages.
After accounting for the cost of the measures proposed in Budget 2008, planned debt reduction in 2007–08 amounts to $10.2 billion. The Government is planning on debt reduction of $2.3 billion in 2008–09 and $1.3 billion in 2009–10.
Table 5.2
Fiscal Outlook
(Including Budget 2008 Measures)
(billions of dollars)
Projection | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
2007–08 | 2008–09 | 2009–10 | Total | |
Revised Budget 2008 underlying surplus |
12.9 | 3.8 | 3.0 | 19.7 |
Measures proposed in Budget 2008 |
2.7 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 5.9 |
Planned debt reduction | 10.2 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 13.8 |
Memorandum | ||||
Measures since Budget 2007: | ||||
Spending | 2.7 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 5.4 |
Tax reductions | 4.8 | 9.6 | 9.5 | 23.9 |
Total | 7.6 | 10.9 | 10.9 | 29.4 |
Note: Totals may not add due to rounding. |
The Government’s fiscal year runs from April 1 to March 31. All revenues and expenses are reported on an accrual basis, meaning that the financial statements take into account not only cash receipts and disbursements, but also estimates of amounts ultimately payable and receivable.
The Government’s accounting policies are based on generally accepted accounting principles for the public sector.
Under these policies, transfer payments can be expensed in a given fiscal year if:
This means that surpluses in one year cannot be used to account for expenses in ongoing programs in future years. Once the fiscal year is over, any surplus reduces the federal debt and increases the Tax Back Guarantee. Under the Guarantee, the Government dedicates the effective interest savings from debt reduction each year to permanent and sustainable personal income tax reductions.
Table 5.3 provides a summary of the Government’s financial position, including the cost of all measures proposed in Budget 2008. Budgetary revenues are expected to increase at a rate below that of overall growth in the economy on average through 2009–10, reflecting the impact of tax reduction measures implemented since Budget 2006 (see the box entitled "Recap: Major Tax Relief Measures" in Chapter 3). These include the 2-percentage-point reduction in the GST rate, increases in the basic personal amount, the reduction of the lowest personal income tax rate to 15 per cent, and the general federal corporate income tax rate reductions to 15 per cent by 2012. Over the forecast horizon, program expenses as a share of GDP are projected to remain below the track set out in Budget 2007. Public debt charges are projected to continue to decline as a percentage of GDP.
Table 5.3
Summary Statement of Transactions
(Including Budget 2008 Measures)
(billions of dollars)
Actual | Projection | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
2006–07 | 2007–08 | 2008–09 | 2009–10 | |
Budgetary revenues | 236.0 | 244.5 | 241.9 | 252.0 |
Program expenses | 188.3 | 201.2 | 208.1 | 218.3 |
Public debt charges | 33.9 | 33.1 | 31.5 | 32.4 |
Total expenses | 222.2 | 234.3 | 239.6 | 250.7 |
Planned debt reduction1 | 14.2 | 10.2 | 2.3 | 1.3 |
Federal debt | 467.3 | 457.1 | 454.8 | 453.5 |
Per cent of GDP | ||||
Budgetary revenues | 16.3 | 16.0 | 15.3 | 15.3 |
Program expenses | 13.0 | 13.2 | 13.1 | 13.2 |
Public debt charges | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Total expenses | 15.4 | 15.3 | 15.1 | 15.2 |
Federal debt | 32.3 | 29.9 | 28.7 | 27.5 |
Note: Totals may not add due to
rounding. 1 Actual debt reduction in 2006–07 (includes other comprehensive income of $479 million). |
The federal debt-to-GDP ratio stood at 32.3 per cent in 2006–07, down significantly from its peak of 68.4 per cent in 1995–96. Taking into account the projected debt reduction, the debt ratio is expected to fall to 27.5 per cent by 2009–10, the lowest level since 1978–79.
Revenues as a share of GDP are projected to fall to 15.3 per cent by 2009–10 from 16.4 per cent in 2004–05. The tax burden in 2009–10 is projected to be the lowest since 1963–64. The decline in the revenue ratio reflects tax relief measures announced in this and previous budgets.
Table 5.4
Revenue Outlook
(Including Budget 2008 Measures)
(millions of dollars)
Actual | Projection | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
2006–07 | 2007–08 | 2008–09 | 2009–10 | |
Tax revenues | ||||
Income tax | ||||
Personal income tax | 110,477 | 112,515 | 118,595 | 125,475 |
Corporate income tax | 37,745 | 42,405 | 36,830 | 36,570 |
Other income tax | 4,877 | 5,910 | 5,890 | 6,100 |
Total income tax | 153,099 | 160,830 | 161,315 | 168,145 |
Excise taxes/duties | ||||
Goods and Services Tax | 31,296 | 30,680 | 27,565 | 28,860 |
Customs import duties | 3,704 | 3,975 | 4,190 | 4,405 |
Other excise taxes/duties | 10,317 | 10,075 | 10,050 | 10,090 |
Total excise taxes/duties | 45,317 | 44,730 | 41,800 | 43,355 |
Total tax revenues | 198,416 | 205,560 | 203,115 | 211,500 |
Employment Insurance premium revenues | 16,789 | 16,520 | 16,530 | 17,330 |
Other revenues | 20,761 | 22,430 | 22,265 | 23,170 |
Total budgetary revenues | 235,966 | 244,510 | 241,910 | 252,000 |
Per cent of GDP | ||||
Personal income tax | 7.6 | 7.4 | 7.5 | 7.6 |
Corporate income tax | 2.6 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 2.2 |
Goods and Services Tax | 2.2 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 1.7 |
Other excise | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
Tax revenues | 13.7 | 13.4 | 12.8 | 12.8 |
Employment Insurance premium revenues | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Other revenues | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 |
Total | 16.3 | 16.0 | 15.3 | 15.3 |
Note: Totals may not add due to rounding. |
Personal income tax revenues—the largest component of budgetary revenues—are projected to increase by $2 billion, or 1.8 per cent, to $112.5 billion in 2007–08. This is below the projected growth rate in personal income, reflecting the impact of recent tax relief measures. Starting in 2008–09, personal income tax revenues increase somewhat faster than personal income, reflecting the progressive nature of the income tax system combined with real income gains.
Corporate income tax revenues are expected to increase by 12.3 per cent in 2007–08, to $42.4 billion, significantly higher than the projected rate of growth in National Accounts profits of 6.9 per cent. The higher projected growth largely reflects significant year-end settlement payments related to one-time factors not reflected in National Accounts profits. These gains are not projected to carry forward over the forecast period. Moreover, corporate income taxes are projected to be dampened by tax relief measures. Therefore, corporate income tax revenues are projected to decline by 13.1 per cent in 2008–09 and by 0.7 per cent in 2009–10.
Other income tax revenues—largely withholding taxes levied on payments to non-residents—are expected to increase by 21.2 per cent to $5.9 billion in 2007–08, reflecting strong growth in underlying collections through the first nine months of the fiscal year. Other income tax revenues are projected to remain relatively flat in 2008–09, reflecting the January 1, 2008 elimination of the withholding tax in respect of arm’s length interest paid to non-resident lenders, as well as the pending elimination, under the Canada-United States Tax Treaty, of withholding tax on non-arm’s length payments of interest to lenders resident in the U.S.
GST revenues are expected to decline by 2.0 per cent in 2007–08, largely reflecting the impact of the 1-percentage-point reduction in the GST rate to 5 per cent, effective January 1, 2008. GST revenues are projected to decline further, by 10.2 per cent in 2008–09, the first full fiscal year under the lower 5-per-cent rate. They are projected to grow by 4.7 per cent in 2009–10, in line with the taxable consumption base.
All other excise taxes and duties are projected to rise by 0.2 per cent in 2007–08, after a 6.7-per-cent increase in 2006–07. The increase in 2006–07 largely reflected the introduction of an export charge on softwood lumber exports to the U.S. effective October 12, 2006, consistent with the Canada-United States Softwood Lumber Agreement, as well as a one-time charge on returned duty deposits under the Agreement. Other excise taxes and duties are projected to increase by 1.4 per cent in 2008–09 and by 1.8 per cent in 2009–10.
Employment Insurance (EI) premium revenues are projected to decrease by 1.6 per cent in 2007–08, reflecting the declines in the premium rate to $1.80 per $100 of insurable earnings, effective January 1, 2007, and to $1.73 effective January 1, 2008. Consistent with the proposed new rate-setting mechanism, which will guarantee that the EI Account will break even over the business cycle, EI premium revenues are assumed to match projected EI program costs over the planning period. This results in relatively unchanged EI premium revenues in 2008–09 followed by an increase of 4.8 per cent in 2009–10, reflecting the private sector expectation of slightly weaker labour market conditions.
Other revenues include those of consolidated Crown corporations, net gains/losses from enterprise Crown corporations, foreign exchange revenues, returns on investments and proceeds from the sales of goods and services. These revenues are volatile, owing partly to the impact of exchange rate movements on the Canadian-dollar value of foreign-denominated interest-bearing assets and to net gains/losses from enterprise Crown corporations. Other revenues are projected to rise 8.0 per cent in 2007–08, due in part to strong growth in year-to-date receipts under the Atlantic Offshore Revenue Accounts, which results in turn from strong growth in offshore production and oil prices to date in 2007–08. This revenue is transferred to Newfoundland and Labrador and Nova Scotia under the Atlantic Offshore Accords, such that there is no net impact on the budgetary balance. Other revenues are projected to decline slightly as a share of GDP in 2008–09 and then remain stable as a share of GDP in 2009–10.
As shown in Chart 5.2, program expenses as a share of GDP rose rapidly between 2000–01 and 2004–05. This trend was reversed in 2005–06, when nominal spending fell by 1 per cent, the first absolute decline in nine years. Since that time, the Government has made important investments to restore fiscal balance, provide historic long-term funding for infrastructure and strengthen Canada’s armed forces. Spending decisions in Budget 2008 continue to be focused and disciplined. As a result, spending as a share of the economy has remained well below the recent high reached in 2004–05, and is expected to remain below the track set out in Budget 2007.
Table 5.5 provides an overview of the projections for program expenses by major component, including the cost of measures proposed in Budget 2008. Program expenses are divided into three components: major transfers to persons, major transfers to other levels of government and direct program expenses—the latter includes subsidies and other transfers, expenses of Crown corporations, and departmental operating expenses.
Table 5.5
Program Expense Outlook
(Including Budget 2008 Measures)
(millions of dollars)
Actual | Projection | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
2006–07 | 2007–08 | 2008–09 | 2009–10 | |
Major transfers to persons | ||||
Elderly benefits | 30,284 | 31,845 | 33,265 | 34,760 |
Employment Insurance benefits1 | 14,084 | 14,445 | 15,295 | 15,875 |
Children’s benefits2 | 11,214 | 11,910 | 11,905 | 11,980 |
Total | 55,582 | 58,200 | 60,465 | 62,615 |
Major transfers to other levels of government |
||||
Federal transfers in support of health and other programs |
28,640 | 31,345 | 33,185 | 35,105 |
Fiscal arrangements3 | 13,066 | 14,530 | 15,250 | 15,800 |
Alternative Payments for Standing Programs4 |
-3,177 | -3,050 | -3,255 | -3,435 |
Canada's cities and communities | 590 | 800 | 1,000 | 2,000 |
Community Development Trust | 1,000 | |||
Public transit | 500 | |||
Police Officers Recruitment Fund | 400 | |||
Early learning and child care | 650 | |||
Clean Air and Climate Change Trust |
1,519 | |||
Patient Wait Times Guarantee Trust |
612 | |||
Transition Trust | 614 | |||
Total | 42,514 | 45,525 | 46,180 | 49,470 |
Direct program expenses | 90,173 | 97,445 | 101,450 | 106,205 |
Total program expenses | 188,269 | 201,165 | 208,095 | 218,290 |
Per cent of GDP | ||||
Major transfers to persons | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.8 |
Major transfers to other
levels of government |
2.9 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 3.0 |
Direct program expenses | 6.2 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 6.4 |
Total program expenses | 13.0 | 13.2 | 13.1 | 13.2 |
Note: Totals may not add due to
rounding. 1 EI benefits include regular EI benefits, sickness, maternity, parental, compassionate care, fishing and work-sharing benefits, and employment benefits and support measures. These represent 90 per cent of total EI program expenses. The remaining EI costs (amounting to $1.6 billion in 2006–07) relate to administration costs. 2 Consists of the Canada Child Tax Benefit and the Universal Child Care Benefit. 3 Fiscal arrangements include Equalization, Territorial Formula Financing, the Youth Allowances Recovery and statutory subsidies. 4 Alternative Payments for Standing Programs are a recovery from Quebec to offset additional tax point transfers. |
Major transfers to persons consist of elderly, EI and children’s benefits, including the Universal Child Care Benefit.
Major transfers and targeted support to other levels of government are projected to increase from $42.5 billion in 2006–07 to $49.5 billion in 2009–10, averaging 5.2 per cent growth per year. This reflects actions taken to restore fiscal balance by placing transfers on a predictable and principled footing and to significantly increase funding for those transfers. This includes increased funding for Equalization, Territorial Formula Financing and the Canada Social Transfer (CST). It also includes a one-time adjustment to increase CST protection levels against declines relative to CST and related child care payments in 2007–08.
Direct program expenses include subsidies and other transfers, expenses of Crown corporations, and departmental operating expenses. The growth in direct program expenses reflects the impact of previous measures, such as the Canada First Defence Strategy and the Building Canada Plan, as well as initiatives announced in Budget 2008, including investments to increase grants for post-secondary education and improve health and safety. Growth also incorporates increases in the cost of ongoing operations, including wage increases.
Subsidies and other transfers are also expected to increase over the budget horizon, reflecting a number of items including the higher transfers to Newfoundland and Labrador and Nova Scotia under the Offshore Accords discussed earlier and transfers to the agriculture sector. The Government will ensure, where appropriate, that royalties to be remitted to the provinces pursuant to federal-provincial agreements proceed in a timely manner under a statutory payment process.
Budget 2008 focuses on a two-year horizon, where the Government can reasonably be held to account. However, in light of global economic uncertainty, it is appropriate to update the five-year fiscal projections presented in the Economic Statement.
Table 5.6 shows the average of private sector economic projections of nominal GDP growth and interest rates through 2012, along with changes since the Economic Statement.
Table 5.6
Private Sector Economic Forecasts, 2007–2012
(per cent)
Projection | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
2007 | 2008 | 2009 |
2010–2012 Average |
|
Nominal GDP growth | 5.7 | 3.5 | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Change since Economic Statement | -0.2 | -1.3 | -0.3 | 0.0 |
3-month treasury bill rate | 4.2 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 4.5 |
Change since Economic Statement | 0.0 | -1.2 | -0.9 | -0.1 |
10-year Government of Canada bond rate | 4.3 | 3.6 | 4.2 | 4.9 |
Change since Economic Statement | -0.1 | -1.1 | -0.8 | -0.1 |
Source: December 2007 Department of Finance survey of private sector forecasters, updated in January 2008. |
Private sector forecasters have revised projected nominal GDP down in every year going forward, resulting in lower projected revenues. As well, the overall average effective tax rate is expected to be weaker over the medium term. Program expenses are expected to be somewhat higher in the outer years relative to the Economic Statement, largely due to the introduction of new measures included in Budget 2008. Projected interest rates are down sharply in the early years of the projection, but are virtually back in line with levels projected at the time of the Economic Statement by the latter years of the projection. As a result, projected debt charges are significantly lower in the early years of the projection, but little changed in the outer years, compared to the Economic Statement.
In 2010–11, the surplus is projected to be $3.1 billion. It is projected to steadily rise to $5.3 billion by 2012–13 (Table 5.7).
Table 5.7
Summary Statement of Transactions (Including Budget 2008 Measures)
(billions of dollars)
Projection | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007–08 | 2008–09 | 2009–10 | 2010–11 | 2011–12 | 2012–13 | |
Budgetary revenues | 244.5 | 241.9 | 252.0 | 263.5 | 273.9 | 283.2 |
Program expenses | 201.2 | 208.1 | 218.3 | 226.8 | 235.4 | 244.8 |
Public debt charges | 33.1 | 31.5 | 32.4 | 33.7 | 33.8 | 33.2 |
Total expenses | 234.3 | 239.6 | 250.7 | 260.5 | 269.2 | 277.9 |
Budgetary surplus | 10.2 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 3.1 | 4.7 | 5.3 |
Planned debt reduction | 10.2 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Remaining surplus | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 2.3 |
Federal debt | 457.1 | 454.8 | 453.5 | 450.5 | 447.5 | 444.5 |
Per cent of GDP | ||||||
Budgetary revenues | 16.0 | 15.3 | 15.3 | 15.2 | 15.1 | 15.1 |
Program expenses | 13.2 | 13.1 | 13.2 | 13.1 | 13.0 | 13.0 |
Public debt charges | 2.2 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
Total expenses | 15.3 | 15.1 | 15.2 | 15.1 | 14.9 | 14.8 |
Federal debt | 29.9 | 28.7 | 27.5 | 26.0 | 24.7 | 23.6 |
Note: Totals may not add due to rounding. |
Planned debt reduction over the budget horizon—2007–08 to 2009–10—is $13.8 billion. Together with planned debt reduction of $3 billion per year for 2010–11 to 2012–13, total debt reduction by the Government since coming into office will be more than $50 billion.
After taking into account planned debt reduction, remaining surpluses are $0.1 billion in 2010–11, rising to $2.3 billion in 2012–13.
The federal debt-to-GDP ratio (accumulated deficit) stood at 32.3 per cent in 2006–07, down significantly from its peak of over 68.4 per cent in 1995–96. Taking into account planned debt reduction, along with projected growth in the economy, the debt-to-GDP ratio is expected to fall to 27.5 per cent by 2009–10. The Government is on track to meet the medium-term objective of reducing the ratio to 25 per cent by 2011–12.
As outlined in Advantage Canada, the Government proposes that Canada should aim to eliminate total government net debt by 2021. With the federal fiscal plan set out in Budget 2008 and with a continued solid provincial fiscal outlook, Canada remains on track to meet this objective.
Since 2002–03, the financial statements of the Government of Canada are presented on a full accrual basis of accounting. Under the previous accounting standard—modified accrual accounting—net debt and the accumulated deficit were identical. Under the new standard, net debt now includes a comprehensive costing for financial liabilities but excludes non-financial assets. The accumulated deficit includes both. It is the sum of all surpluses and deficits in the past, as well as an adjustment for other comprehensive income.
The budgetary balance is presented on a full accrual basis of accounting, recording government liabilities and assets when they are incurred or acquired, regardless of when the cash is paid or received.
Table 5.8
Budgetary Balance, Non-Budgetary Transactions
and Financial Source/Requirement
(billions of dollars)
Actual | Projection | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
2006–07 | 2007–08 | 2008–09 | 2009–10 | |
Budgetary balance | 13.8 | 10.2 | 2.3 | 1.3 |
Non-budgetary transactions | ||||
Pensions and other accounts | 5.1 | 4.5 | 3.9 | 3.4 |
Non-financial assets | -1.2 | -2.5 | -1.4 | -1.1 |
Loans, investments and advances | -2.7 | -6.2 | -17.3 | -8.5 |
Other transactions | -6.5 | 11.0 | -2.9 | 2.8 |
Total | -5.3 | 6.8 | -17.7 | -3.4 |
Financial source/requirement | 8.5 | 17.0 | -15.4 | -2.1 |
Note: Totals may not add due to rounding. |
In contrast, the financial source/requirement measures the difference between cash coming in to the Government and cash going out. This measure is affected not only by the budgetary balance but also by the Government’s non-budgetary transactions. These include changes in federal employee pension accounts; changes in non-financial assets; investing activities through loans, investments and advances; changes in other financial assets and liabilities; and foreign exchange activities. Non-budgetary transactions also include adjustments made to convert the Government’s financial statements from full accrual to cash accounting.
With a projected budgetary surplus of $10.2 billion and a source of $6.8 billion from non-budgetary transactions, a financial source of $17.0 billion is projected for 2007–08. In 2008–09, a financial requirement of $15.4 billion is projected, due in part to budget measures that are expensed in 2007–08 and for which cash payments will be made in 2008–09. It also reflects loans to three major Crown corporations as a consequence of the Budget 2007 decision to consolidate borrowing of certain Crown corporations (see Annex 2). A financial requirement of $2.1 billion is expected in 2009–10.
Pensions and other accounts include the activities of the Government of Canada’s employee superannuation plans, as well as those of federally appointed judges and members of Parliament. Since April 2000, the net amount of contributions less benefit payments related to post-March 2000 service has been invested in capital markets. Contributions and payments pertaining to pre-April 2000 service are recorded in the pension accounts. The Government is committed to efficient and cost-effective administration of the public service pension plans.
The Government also sponsors a variety of future benefit plans, such as health care and dental plans and disability and other benefits for war veterans and others. The financial source associated with pension and other accounts is expected to be $4.5 billion in 2007–08.
Non-financial assets include the cash outlay for the acquisition of new tangible capital assets, proceeds from the sale of tangible capital assets, the amortization of existing tangible assets, losses on the disposal of tangible capital assets, the change in inventories, and prepaid expenses. In the calculation of the budgetary balance, the acquisition of new capital assets is not included; only the amortization of existing tangible assets is included. In the calculation of the financial source/requirement, this is reversed. A net cash requirement of $2.5 billion for non-financial assets is estimated for 2007–08.
Loans, investments and advances include the Government’s investments in enterprise Crown corporations, such as Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC), Canada Post Corporation, Export Development Canada and the Business Development Bank of Canada (BDC). They also include loans, investments and advances to national and provincial governments and international organizations, and for government programs. As announced in Budget 2007, the Government plans to meet all of the borrowing needs of BDC, CMHC and Farm Credit Canada through direct lending to these Crown corporations in order to reduce overall borrowing costs and improve the liquidity of the government securities market. Loans to these Crown corporations are included in this component of the financial source/requirement. Net financial requirements in this component are also attributable to the share of annual profits retained by enterprise Crown corporations and loans made under the Canada Student Loans Program.
Other transactions primarily include the conversion of other accrual adjustments included in the budgetary balance into cash, as well as foreign exchange activities.
Risks associated with the fiscal projections primarily relate to risks to the Canadian economic outlook and volatility in the relationship between fiscal variables and the underlying economic activity to which they relate.
As discussed in Chapter 2, there are considerable uncertainties to the economic outlook, with the risks tilted to the downside.
Tables illustrating the sensitivity of the budget balance to a number of economic shocks are provided later in this chapter. These tables are generalized rules of thumb that provide a guide to the impact of changes in economic assumptions on the fiscal projections.
Even if the economic outlook were known with certainty, there would still be risks associated with the fiscal projections because of the uncertainty in the translation of economic developments into spending and tax revenues. The following are the key sources of uncertainty:
Changes in economic assumptions affect the projections for revenues and expenses. The following tables illustrate the sensitivity of the budgetary balance to a number of economic shocks:
These sensitivities are generalized rules of thumb that assume any decrease in economic activity is proportional across income and expenditure components. EI premium rates are assumed to be fixed during the first calendar year in which the shock occurs, and to adjust for subsequent years, such that EI revenues exactly offset program expenses, consistent with existing legislation governing EI rate setting. Equal and opposite impacts would result from an increase of equal magnitude in real or nominal GDP growth and interest rates.
Table 5.9
Estimated Impact of a One-Year, 1-Percentage-Point
Decrease in Real GDP Growth on Federal Revenues,
Expenses and Budgetary Balance
(billions of dollars)
Year 1 | Year 2 | |
---|---|---|
Federal revenues | ||
Tax revenues | ||
Personal income tax | -1.7 | -1.8 |
Corporate income tax | -0.4 | -0.4 |
Goods and Services Tax | -0.3 | -0.3 |
Other tax revenues | -0.2 | -0.2 |
Total tax revenues | -2.7 | -2.8 |
Employment Insurance premium revenues | -0.1 | 0.7 |
Other revenues | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Total budgetary revenues | -2.8 | -2.1 |
Federal expenses | ||
Major transfers to persons | ||
Elderly benefits | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Employment Insurance benefits | 0.6 | 0.6 |
Children’s benefits | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Total | 0.6 | 0.6 |
Other program expenses | -0.1 | -0.1 |
Public debt charges | 0.1 | 0.2 |
Total expenses | 0.5 | 0.7 |
Budgetary balance | -3.3 | -2.8 |
Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding. |
A 1-percentage-point decrease in real GDP growth reduces the budgetary balance by $3.3 billion in the first year and $2.8 billion in the second year.
Table 5.10
Estimated Impact of a One-Year, 1-Percentage-Point
Decrease in GDP Inflation on Federal Revenues,
Expenses and Budgetary Balance
(billions of dollars)
Year 1 | Year 2 | |
---|---|---|
Federal revenues | ||
Tax revenues | ||
Personal income tax | -1.7 | -1.8 |
Corporate income tax | -0.4 | -0.4 |
Goods and Services Tax | -0.3 | -0.3 |
Other tax revenues | -0.2 | -0.2 |
Total tax revenues | -2.7 | -2.8 |
Employment Insurance premium revenues | -0.1 | -0.1 |
Other revenues | -0.1 | -0.1 |
Total budgetary revenues | -2.8 | -3.0 |
Federal expenses | ||
Major transfers to persons | ||
Elderly benefits | -0.2 | -0.4 |
Employment Insurance benefits | -0.1 | -0.1 |
Children’s benefits | -0.1 | -0.1 |
Total | -0.4 | -0.5 |
Other program expenses | -0.3 | -0.3 |
Public debt charges | -0.3 | 0.1 |
Total expenses | -1.0 | -0.8 |
Budgetary balance | -1.8 | -2.2 |
Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding. |
A 1-percentage-point decrease in GDP inflation (assuming that the Consumer Price Index moves in line with GDP inflation) lowers the budgetary balance by $1.8 billion in the first year and by $2.2 billion in the second.
Table 5.11
Estimated Impact of a Sustained 100-Basis-Point
Decrease in All Interest Rates on Federal Revenues,
Expenses and Budgetary Balance
(billions of dollars)
Year 1 | Year 2 | |
---|---|---|
Federal revenues | -0.6 | -0.8 |
Federal expenses | -1.3 | -1.9 |
Budgetary balance | 0.7 | 1.1 |
A decrease in interest rates raises the budgetary balance by $0.7 billion in the first year and $1.1 billion in the second. The improvement stems entirely from decreased expenses associated with public debt charges. The impact on debt charges rises through time as longer-term debt matures and is refinanced at lower rates. Moderating the overall impact is a fall in revenues associated with the decrease in the rate of return on the Government’s interest-bearing assets, which are recorded as part of non-tax revenues.
Table of Contents - Previous - Next